What is the key difference between Synthetic HTTP monitors and Browser monitors?

The key reason the answer is correct lies in how Synthetic HTTP monitors and Browser monitors differ in their functionality. Synthetic HTTP monitors are designed to simulate HTTP requests and capture performance metrics related to those requests, such as response times and availability of specific endpoints. However, they do not capture user experience metrics that represent the entire user journey because they operate at a lower level, primarily focusing on backend application performance.

In contrast, Browser monitors simulate real user interactions by loading web pages in a real browser environment, allowing them to capture detailed user experience metrics like page load time, visual rendering, and resource loading times. This means that while Synthetic HTTP monitors track the health of the web services and APIs, Browser monitors provide insights into the overall user experience as it would be perceived by actual users visiting a site.

The other options do not accurately address the fundamental differences between the two types of monitors. Browser monitors do not solely focus on backend testing; instead, they assess the frontend experience and how users engage with the web pages. Additionally, HTTP monitors do not perform full page loads in the same comprehensive manner as Browser monitors, which load an entire page and execute JavaScript. Instead, HTTP monitors focus strictly on the performance of HTTP requests, which may not involve the complete rendering